Legal Opinion
Robert Douglas Peterson v. Tim Garrett, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 1, 2026No. 3:23-cv-00016Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 ROBERT DOUGLAS PETERSON, Case No. 3:23-CV-00016-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS TO COMPEL AND DENYING 6 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE 7 TIM GARRETT, et al., [ECF Nos. 89, 90, 92] 8 Defendants. 9 10 Currently pending before the Court are two motions to compel1 filed by Plaintiff 11 Robert Peterson (“Peterson”), (ECF Nos. 89, 90), and a motion to strike2 filed by 12 Defendants, (ECF No. 92). For the reasons discussed below, Peterson’s motions to 13 compel are granted, and Defendants’ motion to strike is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Richard Davis v. Robert H. FendlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.