Talmadge Eugene Hurst v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
There is but one question before us, namely: Was appellant denied a fair trial when the court refused to require disclosure of an informant’s name?
Appellant was charged with the illegal importation of eighty-six pounds of marijuana (21 U.S.C. § 176a). He was found guilty on each of two counts and sentenced to ten years on each count to run concurrently.
The facts are contained in a seven page “Condensed Narrative Statement of Evidence” (Tr. pp. 13-19).
Appellant states in his Brief, p. 6:
“In this appeal the Defendant raises no issue relative to the right of the customs officers to search the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- James Coley Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Willie Bruner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Wardell Pegram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Anastasio Lawrence Amaya v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ben Edward Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Donald F. Lannom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Richard L. Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Black v. Sheraton Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
- Barnaby Ashford Bloomer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.