Legal Opinion

Talmadge Eugene Hurst v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1965No. 19653_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

There is but one question before us, namely: Was appellant denied a fair trial when the court refused to require disclosure of an informant’s name?

Appellant was charged with the illegal importation of eighty-six pounds of marijuana (21 U.S.C. § 176a). He was found guilty on each of two counts and sentenced to ten years on each count to run concurrently.

The facts are contained in a seven page “Condensed Narrative Statement of Evidence” (Tr. pp. 13-19).

Appellant states in his Brief, p. 6:

“In this appeal the Defendant raises no issue relative to the right of the customs officers to search the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. James Coley Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Willie Bruner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Wardell Pegram v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  5. Anastasio Lawrence Amaya v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ben Edward Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Donald F. Lannom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Richard L. Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Black v. Sheraton Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969
  5. Barnaby Ashford Bloomer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API