Legal Opinion

Wardell Pegram v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1959No. 13767_1PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The principal question raised on this appeal concerns the District Court’s denial of a motion to suppress certain evidence. Appellant waived trial by jury and was found guilty by the court of possession of untaxpaid liquor under 26 U.S.C. § 5008(b). Appellant urges that probable cause for search and seizure of appellant’s automobile and the contents thereof did not exist and that his motion to suppress the evidence should have been granted.

It is conceded that about 12:00 noon on December 5, 1957, a criminal investigator of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division received information that a 1949…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Sorrentino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  3. Gilliam v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  4. Beed Fowler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. BurnettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. United States v. James G. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. James T. SkeensCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. The PEOPLE v. DurrIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Herman Russell McLawhorn III v. State of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API