MARK PHILLIP HOBBS v. CONSOLIDATED GRAIN & BARGE CO., Defendant-Respondent.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGary W. Lynch, P.J.
Mark Phillip Hobbs appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition against Consolidated Grain & Barge Co. (“Consolidated”) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Finding no error in that ruling, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
Hobbs filed a petition seeking damages against Consolidated for the malicious prosecution of an earlier lawsuit that Consolidated had brought against Hobbs. The petition alleges that in that underlying lawsuit “the trial court entered judgment in favor of Consolidated on its claims against Mark Hobbs for (a) an implied…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mahoney v. Doerhoff Surgical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Chromalloy American Corp. v. Elyria Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Hasemeier v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- City of Lake Saint Louis v. City of O'FallonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- Zahorsky v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Impey v. ClitheroMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Advanced Physical Therapy, LLC v. Apex Physical Therapy, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
- In the Estate of Virgil D. Williams, Deceased; Estate of Virgil D. Williams v. Kim Bauman, Randy Bauman, Kae Lewis and Chad LewisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- Michael O. Sebright v. Shannon MannMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020