Legal Opinion

Parker v. Faust

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1960PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This action is brought against the defendants, who are real estate agents, to recover a profit alleged to have been received by them upon the sale of a parcel of real property purchased by them from plaintiff. The case was tried without a jury. The trial court rendered a judgment against the defendants for the sum of $6,795.16.

In 1952 the defendant George Faust sold his vendee’s interest in the subject property to plaintiff. On April 23, 1957, plaintiff listed the property with the real estate firm of Payne & Faust, which first did business as a corporation and later as a partnership. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Meek v. HurstSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Bell v. ScudderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Silver v. LogueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Jewell Realty Co. v. DierksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Robinson v. D. Ferguson & SonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Starkweather v. ShafferOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Kaiser Gypsum Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Skeeters v. SkeetersOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API