Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Southern Hills Investments, LLC

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 2006No. 49A05-0504-DV-191PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Defendant, Andrew D. Purcell (Purcell), appeals the trial court's Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in favor of Appellee-Plaintiff, Southern Hills Investments, LLC (Southern Hills), with regard to Southern Hills' Complaint against Purcell alleging a breach of fidu-clary duty and self-dealing.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Purcell raises three issues on appeal, which we restate as the following four issues:(1) Whether the trial court erred by concluding that the manager of a limited liability company (LLC) breached his common law fiduciary duty to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barth v. BarthIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. G & N AIRCRAFT, INC. v. BoehmIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. INS Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Infinity Products, Inc. v. QuandtIndiana Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gottlieb v. KestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Robert B. Allen v. Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. F/K/A Chief Holdings, L.L.C, and Trevor D. Rees-Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  3. Bushi v. Sage Health Care, PLLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Atterholt v. RobinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. WinkleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API