Legal Opinion
JASSO ARANGURE
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2017No. ID 3910PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 178
(BIA 2017) Interim Decision #3910 Matter of Ramon JASSO ARANGURE, Respondent Decided December 29, 2017 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) The Department of Homeland Security is not precluded by res judicata from initiating a separate proceeding to remove an alien as one convicted of an aggravated felony burglary offense under section 101(a)(43)(G) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G) (2012), based on the same conviction that supported a crime of violence aggravated felony charge…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ramon Jasso Arangure v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- L-M-PBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
- Ramon Jasso Arangure v. Matthew WhitakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018