Legal Opinion

Ramon Jasso Arangure v. Matthew Whitaker

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 18, 2018No. 18-3076Published

1Opinion of the Court

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0272p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RAMON JASSO ARANGURE, ┐ Petitioner, │ │ > No. 18-3076 v. │ │ │ MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, │ Respondent. │ ┘ On Petition for Review from the Board of Immigration Appeals; No. A 056 333 337. Argued: November 27, 2018 Decided and Filed: December 18, 2018 Before: THAPAR, BUSH, and NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judges. _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Benjamin Casper Sanchez, Paul Dimick, Zachary Hofeld, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA,…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API