Winegar v. Smith Investment Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of no cause of action on their Complaint to seek reformation of a lease and to seek damages for wrongful failure of defendant to consent to assignment of the lease.
On November 20, 1966, Defendant Smith Investment Company leased to Virgil and Thelma Fox a parcel of its property for the purpose of constructing a carwash. The lease term, commencing on February 15, 1967, was for a period of five years and provided for a renewal term of five years. The Foxes constructed and operated the carwash for almost two years and then assigned the lease to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mobile Acres, Inc. v. KurataSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Mathis v. MadsenUtah Supreme Court · 1953
- University Club v. Invesco Holding CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- Plateau Mining Co. v. Utah Division of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Morris v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
- Hibdon v. Truck Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Miller v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Grow v. Marwick Development, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.