Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Green v. Hodges

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 7, 1914No. 19,119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

The plaintiffs ask that the governor be required by mandamus to appoint a board of chiropractic examiners under the provisions of chapter 291 of the Laws of 1913, relating to the practice of chiropractic.

The first section of the act declares:

“That there is hereby created and established a board to be known by the style and name of the state board of chiropractic examiners, said board shall be composed of one ordained minister, one school teacher, and three *659(3) practicing chiropractors of integrity and ability, who shall be residents of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robertson v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. State ex rel. Taggart v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. State v. CotnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZimmermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. People v. La BarreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API