Legal Opinion

D.D. v. Insurance Co. of North America

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1995No. S-5884PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

The United States District Court for the District of Aaska certified the following question to this court:

Where a physician practices medicine in a building he owns, and has elected not to procure medical malpractice insurance but has procured a business owners policy of insurance with a medical treatment or services exclusion, is the physician entitled to coverage and a defense under the terms of his business owners insurance when he refers a prospective patient to a colleague for a physical examination and the colleague sexually assaults…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Hirst v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Afcan v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Cotton v. KamblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Princeton Insurance v. ChunmuangSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. C.P. Ex Rel. M.L. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. City of Fairbanks v. Amoco Chemical Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Simmons v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. National Chiropractic Mutual Insurance v. DoeDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API