Legal Opinion

Hudak v. Procek

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 21, 1999No. 403, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a decision of the Court of Chancery imposing a resulting trust on certain real property. The trial court applied the general presumption that a party who purchases property, and has it titled in another’s name, intends to retain beneficial ownership. In this case, however, the general rule does not apply because the purchasers are the parents of the record owner. Where the record owner is the natural object of the purchaser’s bounty, such as a child, it is presumed that the purchaser intended to make a gift of the property. Since the Court of Chancery applied the wrong…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  2. Adams v. JankouskasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Hanby v. HanbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  4. McCafferty v. FlinnCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hudak v. ProcekSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. NVF Co. v. New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  3. Don T. Clymer v. Nancy C. DeGirolanoCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2023
  4. Hudak v. ProcekSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  5. Leah Masiello v. Moses B. Johnson, Jr.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API