Legal Opinion

McCafferty v. Flinn

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 30, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

With respect to both of the parcels of real estate involved in this cause, the defendant denies that the complainants have any beneficial interest therein. He claims to be not only the sole legal owner of both properties but as well the sole beneficial owner.

As to the Broome Street property the declaration of trust executed by the defendant is conclusive against him. While he does not admit that he executed it, yet he does not deny it. The utmost extent to which his answer and testimony go is that he has no recollection of executing the document. It was duly recorded. The…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hudak v. ProcekSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
  2. Scribner v. ChonofskyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
  3. Jones v. BodleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
  4. Bullen v. DaviesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  5. Hudak v. ProcekSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API