Legal Opinion

Adanuncio v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeogh, J.

Motion by an infant and Ms father for leave to serve upon the City of New York notices of claim arising in tort, after the expiration of the statutory time pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law.

On August 16, 1950, at about 8:30 p.m., the infant claimant was proceeding on horseback over some vacant land in the Canarsie section of Brooklyn. While doing so, the horse sustained burns by coming in contact with certain chemical or chemically impregnated substances which had been dumped upon that land some time previously, as a result of which the horse threw the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. School Board of Union Free District No. 28New York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Russo v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Nori v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Nori v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  5. Fullam v. Westchester County Playland CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Biancoviso v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Adanuncio v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. Mathusa v. Board of Education, New York County Courts1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API