Legal Opinion

Adanuncio v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— -Appeal from an order denying a motion on behalf of an infant and his father for leave to tile a late notice of claim under section 50-e, of the General Municipal Law. The infant was fifteen years of age at the time of the happening of the accident, and the application was made approximately seven months after the accident. Failure to serve the notice in time was not by reason of infancy or other disability recognized by the statute. Order affirmed, without costs. (Matter of Nori v. City of Yonkers, 274 App. Div. 545, affd. 300 N. Y. 632; Matter of Lustig v. City of New York, 278 App. Div.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nori v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Nori v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Lustig v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. Adanuncio v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Biancoviso v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  2. Rosenberg v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Bosh v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Anderson v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API