Legal Opinion

Howard v. Luke

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1917No. Civil No. 1518PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

This action was instituted by the plaintiffs-appellants to contest a school bond election held in school district No. 38, Maricopa county, Arizona, and to restrain the members of the county board of supervisors, who are the defendants-appellees, from issuing and selling the bonds so voted. The plaintiffs’ right to prosecute the action is based upon their being property owners, taxpayers, and residents of said school district No. 38. They allege that the defendants, the members of the board of supervisors of Maricopa county, have been furnished by the board of trustees of school district No.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Carroll County v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Cain v. Commissioners of Davie CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Block v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. Hicks v. KrigbaumArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Bittinger v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Board of Sup'rsArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Alexander v. PhillipsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Parks v. School District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Garrett v. Tubac-Amado School District No. 5 of Santa Cruz CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. McDonald v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API