Legal Opinion

Bittinger v. Bell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 35 opinions

From the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This was a suit by tbe appellees, “ each the owner of personal and real property in Pike township,” in Warren county, Indiana, “subject to taxation for the year 1877,” as plaintiffs, against the appellant, Samuel Bittinger, treasurer of said Warren county, as defendant. The object of the suit was to obtain a perpetual injunction against the appellant, as treasurer of said county, restraining and enjoining him from collecting, or attempting to collect, a certain tax which had been levied and assessed on the taxable property in said Pike township, for the purpose of enabling said township to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Evansville, Indianapolis & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Bissell v. CouchaineOhio Supreme Court · 1846
  3. Wiggin v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  4. City of Burlington v. GilbertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  5. People Ex Rel. Bodine v. GoodwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Western Construction Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Brocaw v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Gibson v. Miami Valley Milk Producers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API