Bucella v. Agrippino
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
The findings of fact made by the Land Court are final. No claim for jury trial was made. G. L. c. 185, §§ 15, 16. Levenson v. Ciampa, 251 Mass. 379. Mitchell v. Cobb, 220 Mass. 60. They establish that the respondents Agrippino have a right in the passageway for access to the rear of their premises and for the removal therefrom of ashes and garbage; and that the respondent Einingis has *487a right to use the passageway for the removal of ashes and garbage from his premises.
The petitioners have not argued that the decision is wrong so far as it deals with the rights of the Agrippinos. They contend,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wintersmith & Young v. Pointer & ConwayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
- Bigelow Carpet Co. v. WigginMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Mitchell v. CobbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Levenson v. CiampaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ryan v. StavrosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Jones v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Marta v. TrinciaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- Langevin v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Abbott v. MarsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.