Legal Opinion

Levenson v. Ciampa

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 25, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The Land Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this petition, not only to register the title, but also to determine the extent of the easement claimed by the petitioner, G. L. c. 185, § 1(a).

The burden of proof was on the petitioner. Lipsky v. Heller, 199 Mass. 310. Hughes v. Williams, 229 Mass. 467.

The testimony objected to was no more than a description of the premises and of the conduct of the holders of the easement in the passageway in regard to the use made of it. Such testimony has been admitted and considered in many cases, for the reasons set out in Salisbury v. Andrews,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wintersmith & Young v. Pointer & ConwayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  2. Lipsky v. HellerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Hughes v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Salisbury v. AndrewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  5. Burnham v. NevinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Geragosian v. Union Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Dubinsky v. CamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Makepeace Bros. v. Town of BarnstableMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Bucella v. AgrippinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API