(PS) Pendarvis v. Elk Grove Self Help Housing Employees
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHARON D. PENDARVIS, No. 2:22-cv-0139-KJM-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ELK GROVE SELF HELP HOUSING 15 EMPLOYEES, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with a first amended complaint naming the 19 Elk Grove Police Department and Sacramento Self Help Housing as defendants. The first 20 amended complaint is before the court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).1 21 I. SCREENING AND PLEADING STANDARDS 22 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.