Legal Opinion
Requardt v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 25, 1923PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
The residuary danse of the will of Charles Hook, of the City of Baltimore, who died in 1906, is, in part, as follows:
“All the rest and residue of the corpus of my estate I desire the said Safe Deposit and Trust Company to invest the same in safe securities and from the interest, income .and emolument derived from same to pay. my brothers and sister as follows, that is to say: One-third to Jacob W. Hook, one-third to Sebastian J. Hook, and one-third to Katherine Brauer, and on the ...death of either of said beneficiaries their respective shares in the said income shall be paid to their issue,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McPherson v. SnowdenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- Slingluff v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Brittain v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
- Levering v. OrrickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Plummer v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cunningham v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Patchell v. GroomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Judik v. TraversCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Lobe v. GoldheimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Clarke v. CLARKE, TRUSTEECourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.