Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Kaplan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1995No. 93-17123PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

60 F.3d 834

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Eric SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Gary KAPLAN, HMSF Residency Section Supervisor; Daryl

Directo, prison guard; Robert Johnson, prison guard;

William Oku, former HCF Warden; Cinda Sandin, HHSF

Residency Section Supervisor; Howard Apao, prison guard;

Thomas Lau, prison guard; Roland Ahuna, prison guard;

Allen Anduha, prison guard;…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rex Chappell v. R. MandevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Rex Chappell v. R. MandevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. S. Thomas v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. BAEZ v. FROELICHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Berry v. Sullivan County JailDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API