United States v. Castillo-Garcia
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
After obtaining and executing five separate but related telephone wiretapping orders, the government secured evidence sufficient to indict eighteen members of an alleged drug conspiracy. In a pre-trial order, however, the district court suppressed all evidence obtained pursuant to four of the five wiretapping orders, on the grounds that the government had not demonstrated sufficient “necessity” for those wiretaps. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2518(10)(b) (1994), the government now appeals the district court’s suppression order. We exercise jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Verdin-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- United States v. IilandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Cline, TimothyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.