In re Wulzen
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Habeas Corpus. Applications,by Wesley G. Wulzen and by Tester Doyle to secure release from custody under state court process. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
SATER, District Judge.
[1] In each of the cases before me the prayer is for a writ of habeas corpus. One is brought to secure the release of Captain Wulzen, who has been arrested on the charge of disturbing the peace, good order, and quiet of the city of Hamilton, by applying abusive and indecent language to Charles Baker, contrary to the form of an ordinance of that city. The fact that the arrest is under an ordinance is immaterial, if the ordinance is valid. The other case is brought for the discharge of Sergeant Doyle, who has also been arrested, the charge against him being an unlawful…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- The Brig Amy WarwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Ohio v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States Ex Rel. Drury v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re McShane's PetitionDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1964
- Rosenau v. Idaho Mutual Benefit Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Ex Parte SumnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Girard v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
- Verano v. De Angelis Coal Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.