Legal Opinion

Grund v. Grund

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

H. Patrick Leis, III, J.

The central issue in this divorce action is whether or not the defendant husband’s SCATT benefits constitute marital property subject to equitable distribution. For the reasons set forth infra, the court concludes that SCATT benefits are marital property.

*853The parties were married on June 16, 1962. This action for divorce was commenced on December 21, 1988. The plaintiff wife is 51 years old and the defendant is 50. The parties have three children, Daniel, age 27, born on June 23, 1963, Thomas, age 25, born on August 9, 1965 and Michael, age 20, born…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Rodgers v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  2. In re the Marriage of CardonaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. Dooling v. DoolingNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Marriage of Abrell v. AbrellIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  5. In re the Marriage of CardonaColorado Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API