State v. Daniels

The focal point of this case is the following pertinent language of Crim. R. 16 (B)(1)(g):

“Upon completion of a witness’ direct examination at trial, the court on motion of the defendant shall conduct an in camera inspection of the witness’ written or recorded statement with the defense attorney and prosecuting attorney present and participating, to determine the existence of inconsistencies, if any, between the testimony of such witness and the prior statement.” (Emphasis added.) See, also, State v. White (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 146 [44 O.O.2d 132].

Appellant contends that the phrase “present…