Western Pennsylvania National Bank v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KNOX, District Judge.
Plaintiff has brought suit against the United States and the -Internal Revenue Service by a complaint entitled “Civil Action In the Nature of a Garnishment”. Paragraph 4 of the complaint states that it is “in the nature of a writ of garnishment ... to attach the surplus proceeds of levies, attachments and monies obtained in a pending inter-pleader suit filed by Coventry Care, which sums are owing to Contemporary Institute, Inc. and one or more of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The attachment is to apply to all proceeds and money which comes in the possession of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Malone v. BowdoinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Crow v. Wyoming Timber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- Wallingford Steel Co. v. Wire & Metal Specialties Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Oil Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1974
- Henry Vlietstra Plastering & Acoustical Co. v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1975
- Alabama Exchange Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974