Legal Opinion

Western Pennsylvania National Bank v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 9, 1973No. Civ. A. 72-796PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KNOX, District Judge.

Plaintiff has brought suit against the United States and the -Internal Revenue Service by a complaint entitled “Civil Action In the Nature of a Garnishment”. Paragraph 4 of the complaint states that it is “in the nature of a writ of garnishment ... to attach the surplus proceeds of levies, attachments and monies obtained in a pending inter-pleader suit filed by Coventry Care, which sums are owing to Contemporary Institute, Inc. and one or more of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The attachment is to apply to all proceeds and money which comes in the possession of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Malone v. BowdoinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Crow v. Wyoming Timber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. Wallingford Steel Co. v. Wire & Metal Specialties Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Oil Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Henry Vlietstra Plastering & Acoustical Co. v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1975
  3. Alabama Exchange Bank v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API