Legal Opinion

Latimer v. Cranor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 19, 1954No. 14156PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

Latimer, haying been convicted of grand larceny by a superior court of the State of Washington, appeals from the denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus to free him from the judgment. Latimer claims that the facts alleged in his application require a hearing upon evidence to sustain it and that the district court erred in denying such a hearing.

The district court had jurisdiction, for Latimer had applied to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington for a writ of habeas corpus and on its denial had sought certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. McKane v. DurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Troy Cooper v. C. J. FitzharrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Amos Black v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Jesus Rivera v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. W. C. Dodd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. George T. Jordan v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia, George T. Jordan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API