Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Stanford

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 5, 1991No. 5-89-0450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lewis

This cause comes on for appeal from the judgment of the circuit court of Clay County wherein the court determined that it lacked personal jurisdiction over one of the heirs, Carole Miller; vacated all orders entered following the admittance of Arvilla S. Stanford’s (the decedent’s) will to probate; and reopened the estate for probate. The court found that the notice requirements of section 6 — 10(a) of the Probate Act of 1975 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. ll01/2, par. 6 — 10(a)), regarding informing the heirs and legatees of their right to require formal proof of the will and their right to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Marriage of VerdungIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re Estate of MillsapIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. In Re Marriage of ParksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Vogel v. KatzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of SteinfeldIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. O'CONNELL v. WillAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Pruitt v. JockischAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Colbert v. DoraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. In Re Estate of SteinfeldIllinois Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API