City of Knoxville v. Ambrister
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson
This bill was filed by the City of Knoxville. The relief sought is (1) a decree declaring that a certain parcel of land within the City had been dedicated to it for park .and recreational purposes, or (2), in the alternative, “if the Court finds ’ ’ there has been no dedication, then that defendants be required to convey the property to the City for park and recreational purposes “ pursuant to complainant’s .acceptance of June 10, 1947, and demand of December 9, 1952”. From the decree of the Chancellor, sustaining demurrers and dismissing the bill the City has appealed.
One of the two…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Whitley v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
- Osborne v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dacy v. Village of RuidosoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- Treme v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Haymon v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
- Andres v. Village of FlossmoorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Concerned Loved Ones & Lot Owners Ass'n v. PenceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.