Legal Opinion
Kean v. Stone
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 3, 1992No. 91-5944PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Gary Kean was the prevailing party in a discrimination action brought before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) and requested attorney fees, calculated at the market rate under 5 U.S.C. § 7701(g). The district court granted summary judgment against Kean and awarded attorney fees calculated at cost-plus-overhead because Kean was represented by a salaried union attorney. The sole issue on appeal is whether when one prevails in a discrimination action, represented by a salaried union attorney before the Board, one is entitled to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Student Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc. And Friends of the Earth, in 86-5927 v. At & T Bell Laboratories, in 86-5895Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Centennial Archaeology, Inc. v. AECOM, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Larry Raney v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Rebecca H. Holmes v. Millcreek Township School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- McLendon v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.