Legal Opinion

Alpers v. Hunt

California Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1890No. 12801PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

— This is an action brought by the plaintiff, as assignee of William L. Bolte, against John Hunt, executor of the last will and testament of George F. Sharp, to recover a sum of money claimed to be due on a contract alleged to have been made by Sharp and J. C. McCeney with plaintiff’s assignor. On the trial verdict and judgment passed for plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial, which was granted, and from the order granting the motion plaintiff appealed.

The main question to be determined herein arises on the complaint. The averments of the complaint set forth that, prior to the first day…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. License Tax CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Spanagel v. DellingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Onderdonk v. City & Cty. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. C. S. Dudley & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. Ingersoll v. Coal Creek Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Holland v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API