Hunt v. Hammel
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. D. K. Trask, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant here appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The suit was brought for the conversion of a certain stock of goods and some fixtures used by the plaintiff in her millinery business, of the value of $2,750, of which it is alleged that on the fifth day of March, 1900, plaintiff was the owner and in possession, and that "on said date the defendants wrongfully took the said goods and converted them to their own use." The property was taken by the defendant Hammel under attachment in favor of the other defendants against John F.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stevens v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Kelly v. McKibbenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Dubois v. SpinksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Black v. HillikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Byxbee v. DeweyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Guthrie v. CarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Staley v. McClurkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Cole v. RileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936