Stanton v. Panish
California Supreme Court
1DissentBird, C. J.
I must respectfully dissent from this “By the Court” opinion for two important reasons.
I
The issue before this court is a relatively simple one. The state Constitution provides that if a vacancy occurs in a superior court judgeship in an election year, the Governor is to appoint the replacement who then must run for that position at the next general election. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 16, subd. (c).) The question presented is whether this court should completely rewrite this section to achieve a result that the court deems preferable. I submit this is not our function and the attempt to do so…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Fields v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. Perrone C.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Anderson v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.