Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stanton v. Panish

California Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1980No. L.A. 31289Published

1DissentBird, C. J.

I must respectfully dissent from this “By the Court” opinion for two important reasons.

I

The issue before this court is a relatively simple one. The state Constitution provides that if a vacancy occurs in a superior court judgeship in an election year, the Governor is to appoint the replacement who then must run for that position at the next general election. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 16, subd. (c).) The question presented is whether this court should completely rewrite this section to achieve a result that the court deems preferable. I submit this is not our function and the attempt to do so…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Fields v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. Perrone C.California Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Anderson v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API