Fay v. Hunt
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.
[After the foregoing statement of the case.] The defendants in their .brief state that they rely upon all objections set forth in the exceptions. None, therefore, are waived. We do not think it necessary, however, to notice those not argued.
The law presumes, in the absence of fraud, that the defendants read the note signed by them. Grace v. Adams, 100 Mass. 505.
The holder of a promissory note who has no beneficial interest in it can maintain an action on it. National Pemberton Bank v. Porter, 125 Mass. 333. Haskell v. Avery, 181 Mass. 106.
There was evidence of a consideration for the original…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sumner v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- Grace v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- National Pemberton Bank v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Smith v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Haskell v. AveryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
3Cited by13 opinions
- Guinan v. Famous Players-Lasky Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Eastern Advertising Co. v. ShapiroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Commonwealth v. CongdonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Jump v. LeonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.