Commonwealth v. Congdon
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
The questions raised by the defendants’ bill of exceptions arose in the trial of two indictments together, at a sitting of the Superior Court for the county of Essex. *168The first indictment (No. 13022) charged the defendant Harold Congdon and fourteen others with conspiracy “to illegally expose and keep for sale certain intoxicating liquor ” in the town of Salisbury. The record shows that all the defendants were acquitted except Harold Congdon, Everett R. George, Ruel'S. Getchell, Warren S. Frothingham, and Howard F. George, and that each one of the convicted defendants was sentenced to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Vogel v. GruazSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Worthington v. ScribnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Commonwealth v. CulverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Eastern Advertising Co. v. ShapiroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Commonwealth v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Commonwealth v. NoxonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Commonwealth v. McGartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Commonwealth v. EnnisMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.