Legal Opinion

Cottingham v. Hill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Bibb Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. John Moore. The appellees sued the appellants to recover a parcel of land, Avhich was described in the complaint the same as in plaintiffs’ deed. This description and all the facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court- The case Avas tried on an agreed statement of facts. From a* judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Bibb Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. John Moore. The appellees sued the appellants to recover a parcel of land, Avhich was described in the complaint the same as in plaintiffs’ deed. This description and all the facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court- The case Avas tried on an agreed statement of facts. From a* judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Plaintiffs’ deed is void for uncertainty in the description of the lands. — 2 DeAdin on Deeds, 1010, 1011; Wofford v. McKenna, 76 Am. Dec. 53; Howard v. North, 51 Am. Dec. 769; Rule 28 Elphinstone’s Inter, of…

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

The appellees sued in ejectment to recover an acre of land. Plaintiffs and defendants claim from a common source, the plaintiffs’ deed having been executed first. There is no controversy as to the facts. The contention is whether plaintiffs’ deed is void for want of a sufficient description of the land, and Avhether parol evidence Avas admissible to identify the land. The deed describes the land as follow's: “One acre of land situated on the old Columbiana and Centreville road, on Avhich the school house is to be built, and more particularly described as part of N. W. ¼ of N. W. ¼ of section…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chambers v. RingstaffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Homan v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Webb v. Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Clements v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. Clement v. Draper Mathis & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Karter v. EastSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Nolen v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Alabama Central Railroad v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. First Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. ElginNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Little v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API