(PS)Singh v. Lipworth

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAJ SINGH, No. 2:25-cv-01610-DJC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 STEPHEN LIPWORTH, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 18 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed a request for leave to proceed 19 in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and submitted a declaration averring that he is unable to pay the costs 20 of this proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be 21 granted.…