Legal Opinion

Grossman v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 21, 2014No. 107929PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nuss, C.J.:

Patrick B. Grossman filed a motion for postconviction relief under K.S.A. 60-1507, alleging his counsel at a probation revocation hearing was unconstitutionally ineffective. The district court denied his motion after a preliminary hearing, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. We granted his petition for review.

We agree with Grossman that the Court of Appeals erred by applying the doctrine of res judicata to bar his claim. But because his claim is meritless, we affirm both lower courts’ denials of his motion.

Facts and Procedural History

In 2007,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sola-Morales v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. NeerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Rowland v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. MaySupreme Court of Kansas · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. InghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  2. Calhoun v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
  3. Quinn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
  4. Bogguess v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017
  5. Coryell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API