Legal Opinion

Univ. of Findlay v. Martin

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2017No. 5–17–02PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillamowski, J.

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Brad Martin ("Martin"), USA Lawns, Inc. ("USA"), and Pat McKinnis ("McKinnis"), collectively known as "the Appellants", bring this appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Hancock County denying summary judgment to the Appellants, determining that plaintiff-appellee the University of Findlay ("the University") had standing to pursue the claim, and for denying the Appellants' motion to dismiss at trial. For the reasons set forth below, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part.

{¶ 2} On December 10, 2013, the University contracted with USA…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vancrest Mgt. Corp. v. MullenhourOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Dunn v. Devco Holdings, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API