Legal Opinion

Reisinger v. Luzerne County

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 2, 2010No. 3:09-cv-01554PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

RICHARD P. CONABOY, District Judge.

Here we consider the three motions to dismiss pending in this action in which Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and pendant state law claims. With these motions, all Defendants who have acknowledged service seek dismissal. 1 The Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6) Filed on Behalf of Defendants, The Cadle Company II, Inc., Daniel C. Cadle, Michael Kermec, Doug Harrah, Tina Randazzo and Kevin Fogerty (Doc. 25) (“Cadle Defendants’ Motion”) was filed on October 12, 2009, and became ripe on December…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cozzone v. AXA Equitable Life Insurance Society of the United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Ogilvie v. Nationstar Mortgage LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Oak Street Printery, LLC v. Fujifilm North America Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Bolus v. Carnicella, EsquireDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Hamilton v. Centre County Tax Claim BureauDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API