Legal Opinion

Kay v. Martin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 16, 1989No. 89-140PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

Marion Kay, executrix, appeals from a judgment in favor of Peggy Martin for personal injury against the estate of J.D. Kay. The claim arose from an automobile collision. Mr. Kay’s estate contends it had to accept a juror it did not want because its last remaining peremptory challenge was used to excuse a juror who should have been excused for cause. It is also argued that a list of medical expenses incurred by Ms. Martin should not have been admitted into evidence because it was not shown that they were necessary. We affirm because we find the estate did not use all its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell v. Stafford Ex Rel. StaffordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Rickett v. HayesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  3. Henry v. LandrethSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. Mason v. LovingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First Pyramid Life Insurance Co. of America v. StoltzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Ponder v. CartmellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Young v. BarberaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Ponder v. CartmellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Ponder v. CartmellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API