City of Hapeville v. Preston
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyrk, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) “The principle involved in the compensation acts, is that the benefits received are a substitute for the wages of the injured employee, and with this theory in mind the legislatures of all States, except three, have provided for periodical payments. The purpose of this method of payment is to preclude any possibility of an imprudent employee or dependent wasting the means provided for his support and thereby becoming a burden on society. Fraternal insurance statistics show that more than fifty per cent, of the insurance money paid to widows and orphans…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. EnglandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Gravitt v. Georgia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Home Accident Insurance v. McNairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- International Coal & Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- South v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. CrowderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Baggett Transportation Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Bituminous Casualty Corporation v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.