Legal Opinion

Senese v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 2, 1967No. Gen. 50,828PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Drucker

Plaintiffs appeal from a dismissal of their amended complaint.

According to the amended complaint, plaintiffs were in the cartage business under the name of Ogden Cartage Company. One of the plaintiffs, Carmen Senese, was employed by the City of Chicago as a tree trimmer. The City invited bids, as set out in Exhibit A,1 for the hire of truck services; on April 22, 1964, the plaintiffs submitted sealed, written proposals (the form of which was set out in Exhibit A) 1 which were accepted by the defendants; pursuant to the terms and conditions of these proposals a priority of call was established…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Admiral Oasis Hotel Corp. v. Home Gas Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Kita v. YMCA of Metropolitan ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Central Illinois Electric & Gas Co. v. ScullyIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Morphet v. MorphetAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Presto Manufacturing Co. v. Formetal Engineering Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Bohannon v. SchertzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Cheadle v. County Board of School TrusteesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Cheadle v. CO. BD. OF SCHOOL TRUSTEESAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Senese v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API