Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Azar

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1990No. 89-2483Published

1Per curiam

The defendants, Frank Kelly and Jose-phthal & Co., Inc. [collectively referred to as “Josephthal”], appeal from a non-final order denying their motion to stay pending arbitration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(v), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Alberto Soberanes Azar and Sara Beatriz Albert Zepeda [collectively referred to as “the customers”] discussed opening an account at Josephthal with Frank Kelly, a Josephthal representative. Josephthal is a securities broker-dealer. The customers, residents of Mexico, do not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cancanon v. Smith Barney, Harris, Upham & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  2. BIRCHTREE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. LanceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API