Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Corkery

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

COMPLAINT, to the Third District Court of Eastern Middle-sex, for the larceny of milk cans. At the trial in the Superior Court, on appeal, before Bond, J., the jury returned a verdict of guilty ; and the defendant alleged exceptions to the admission of certain evidence, the nature of which appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, C. J.

This was a complaint for the larceny of milk cans. The third count was for stealing cans of the property of the Boston Dairy Company. The fourth was for stealing cans of the property of H. P. Hood and Sons. At the trial the other elements of the crime were proved, and the government was allowed, subject to exception, to introduce certificates of the commissioner of corporations purporting to be copies of certified copies of the charter of the Boston Dairy Company as a corporation under the laws of Maine, and the charter of H. P. Hood and Sons, as a corporation under the laws of New Hampshire.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tapley v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Commonwealth v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  3. Whiton v. Albany City InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Inhabitants of Shutesbury v. Inhabitants of HadleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. Commonwealth v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  2. State v. KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. StevensonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Grover v. SmeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Commonwealth v. BrennorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API