Gardiner v. Tisdale
Wisconsin Supreme Court
ERROR TO ROCK COUHTY CIRCUIT COURT. This was an action of ejectment, commenced by tlie plaintiff in error against Tisdale & Tondro, to re-' cover a part of tlie southeast fractional quarter of fractional section 85, town one, range twelve, particularly described in tlie declaration as follows: being a building now occupied by defendants as a grocery, and the land on which it is situated, bounded on the west by a meat market occupied by Phillip Lovell ; and on the east side…
Read the full summary
ERROR TO ROCK COUHTY CIRCUIT COURT. This was an action of ejectment, commenced by tlie plaintiff in error against Tisdale & Tondro, to re-' cover a part of tlie southeast fractional quarter of fractional section 85, town one, range twelve, particularly described in tlie declaration as follows: being a building now occupied by defendants as a grocery, and the land on which it is situated, bounded on the west by a meat market occupied by Phillip Lovell ; and on the east side by a certain building recently occupied by ¥m, Talbot; being on the south side of the highway leading on to the east end…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
CuAwroun, X
On the trial of this ■ cause in the Circuit Court, the plaintiff read in evi- ' dence a patent from the United States to Robert P. Crane, bearing date the 9th day of May, A. D. 1842, for certain lots or tracts of land, within which is embraced the particular land .now in controversy. He also gave in evidence a quit-claim deed from Robert P. Crane and wife to himself (the plaintiff) for a portion of the lands described in the. patent, and now ' contained within the limits of the village of Beloit, in Rock county, and proved that the lot and tenement described in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- President of Cincinnati v. Lessee of WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Jackson ex dem. Yates v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Peck v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
- Post v. PearsallCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Diedrich v. Northwestern Union Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Humphreys v. Bennett Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Paine Lumber Co. v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Krueger v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.