Legal Opinion

James A. Shedd & Co. v. Bank of Brattleboro

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1860PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Bill in Chancery. The bill set forth, in substance, that for sóme months previous to the 1st of September, 1857, John Robertson, Edwin R. Robertson, and 3.0. C. Cook, were partners in the manufacture of paper, at Hinsdale, New Hampshire, and Bartonsville, Vermont, under the names of Robertson, Cook & Co., and E. R. Robertson & Co,, respectively; that on the 25th of September, 1857, such firms still continuing in existence, the defendants held various notes and bills of…

Read the full summary

Bill in Chancery. The bill set forth, in substance, that for sóme months previous to the 1st of September, 1857, John Robertson, Edwin R. Robertson, and 3.0. C. Cook, were partners in the manufacture of paper, at Hinsdale, New Hampshire, and Bartonsville, Vermont, under the names of Robertson, Cook & Co., and E. R. Robertson & Co,, respectively; that on the 25th of September, 1857, such firms still continuing in existence, the defendants held various notes and bills of exchange, made, drawn, indorsed or accepted by John and Edwin R. Robertson, and by Robertson, Cook & Co., none of which had…

1Opinion of the Court

Redpield, Ch. J,

It is obvious that most of the topics discussed at the bar are not even remotely alluded to in the bill. There is nothing here in regard to this having been, in part or whole, the debt of the former firm, composed of John and Edwin R. Robertson, and so the effects of the Robertsons & Cook not liable for it. But from the statement in. the bill that Cook had been a partner some months before the 1st of September, 1857, and the fact that the oldest paper held by the defendants was made June 10, 1857, on four months, we infer that it was the debt of the Robertsons & Cook on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shedd v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  2. Paddock v. PalmerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  3. Fletcher v. EdsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1836

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber, Co. (In Re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
  2. Chittenden Trust Co. v. Sebert Lumber Co. (In Re Vermont Toy Works, Inc.)District Court, D. Vermont · 1991
  3. Thayer v. HumphreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Bean v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1915
  5. Soper v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API