Soper v. Fry
Michigan Supreme Court
Case made from Newaygo. Held that these were as properly reviewable on case made as on bill of exceptions. Trespass on the case. The facts are in the opinion.
1Per curiam
Motion to dismiss a case made on the ground that only questions of evidence were involved, and this court could not review cases on the facts. It appeared however that there were exceptions to the rulings of the court on the admission aud rejection of evidence.
Held that these were as properly reviewable on case made as on bill of exceptions. Motion denied. Trespass on the case. The facts are in the opinion. Albert G. Bay for plaintiff.
The doctrine that an assignment for the benefit of creditors can only be attacked by judgment creditors (Millar v. Babcock, 29 Mich., 526; Hastings v. Belknap,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Thatcher v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Wakeman v. GroverNew York Court of Chancery · 1832
- Beverly v. BurkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Hyslop & Cambpell v. ClarkeNew York Supreme Court · 1817
- Fonda v. Van HorneNew York Supreme Court · 1836
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- New York Trust Co. v. Detroit, T. & I. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- H. S. Burr & Co. v. Frank Mathers & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1892
- Davenport Mills Co. v. ChambersIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Buchanan v. Scandia Plow Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1895
- Richey v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.