H. S. Crocker Co. v. County of Lake
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment disallowing the bulk of a claim for the balance due upon a valid contract for furniture sold and supplied for use in the courthouse of Lake County. When the contract for the furniture was awarded there 'was ample money in the “Capital Outlay Court House Fund” with which to pay the claim, but before the contract was fully performed, that fund was practically exhausted by the payment of claims which were subsequently incurred. On the assumption that plaintiff’s claim was not a liability against the county, except to the extent of the money. remaining…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Arthur v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Weaver v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Briney v. Santa Ana High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Niceley v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Association Collectors, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- H. S. Crocker Co. v. County of LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Jordan v. Williams Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936